Autocratic leadership is also known as authoritarian leadership. Leadership is the process of motivating a group of people to act towards accomplishing a common task. Workers can be motivated to give their best by respect and recognition. Group members are not allowed to be in positions of leadership, so all rests with. Some studies say that organizations with many autocratic leaders have higher turnover and absenteeism than other organizations.
The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style. While autocratic leadership is one of the least popular management. When faced with the need to provide a decision, an autocratic leader is one who. The team cannot put forward their views even if they are best for the teams or organizational interests. A manager adopting this style of management dictates orders to his or her employees and is often taking control of every situation that they are in.
The subordinates of an autocratic leader are not involved in decision making and have little if. The details on what they are, their pros, their cons and also their best implementations in the business world follow. Autocratic leader autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a style characterized by individual control. Although it has fallen out of favor in recent decades, the autocratic leadership style is still prevalent. Here are the key advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership to consider. For some background into how leadership styles developed see this article about kurt lewin, one of the first to explore different leadership styles. These people know their worth and know they can find a job somewhere else. The autocratic leadership style is determined by the leaders power due to the fact that the leader has absolute power in a group or organization. Pdf the impact of autocratic and democratic leadership. Well study the contexts in which it was born and look at how it is shaping the modern world. May 10, 2019 autocratic leadership examples can be found in all positions of power, such as community leaders, workplace managers, religious leaders and even in the home. Psychologist kurt lewin categorized three main leadership styles. Some of the more common styles include autocratic, bureaucratic, leadership and laissezfaire.
List of the advantages of the autocratic leadership style 1. Well also study the strengths and weaknesses of this style of leadership. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. As utilized in the study, these three leadership styles were considered and tested to determine its relationship with job satisfaction and performance. The leader does not delegate authority or permit subordinates to participate in policy. A management style is the particular way managers go about accomplishing these objectives.
It is about how managers plan and organise work in their area of responsibility. Autocratic leadership otherwise known as a authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style deem by individuals as control over all decisions and little input from group tem members. All management styles can be categorized by three major types. In relation to treatment of subordinates, there are two types of. Autocratic leadership is an extreme version of taskoriented or assertive leadership. The studies identified the autocratic leadership style and the democratic leadership style as the two basic leadership styles lussier and achua, 2007. Autocratic leadership does it have a place in todays. Nov 25, 2014 autocratic leadership is vital in many workplace environments. Autocratic leadership style is a classical leadership approach that functions by commanding workers, without providing them explanations or including them in the decision making process. An autocratic style means that the manager makes decisions unilaterally and without much regards for subordinates. Feedback can improve an autocratic leadership style. Hoel and salin 2003 stressed that autocratic leadership is a leadership style where all of the decisions originate from the top level of the management while the lowerlevel management are the followers and doers of the responsibilitiestasks. An autocratic leader is wellequipped to deal with a crisis situation.
One big issue with this style is how it affects morale. You can find out more about leadership styles in our article. A critique of the characteristics of an autocratic. Autocratic leadership also known as authoritarian leadership relies primarily on the use of authority in groups and in organizations goethals, 2004. Top 10 best management styles and which ones to avoid. Successful instructional leadership styles in education gina smith, grand canyon university maria minor, kaplan university henry brashen, clear and effective communications kristie remaly, walden university abstract the purpose of this research study was to explore the dominant leadership styles of online college instructors. Such a leader has full control of the team, leaving low autonomy within the group the leader has a vision in mind and must be able to effectively. Well examine the core characteristic of the leadership style and provide you with the traits of an autocratic leader. In the autocratic leadership or the authoritarian leadership style, the power and decisionmaking reside with the leader. Study on autocratic leadership style management essay. The leaders approach to decision making and problem solving ai. Authoritarian, transactional style managers have a position of authority vested in them by the company, and their subordinates work for them and largely do as they are told. It encompasses the way they make decisions, how they plan and organize work, and how they exercise authority. On the other hand, a leadership style in which the leader.
According to daft 2008, an autocratic leader is one who tends to centralize authority and derive power from position, control of rewards, and coercion. Autocratic management is the form of leadership that enables managers to make decisions unilaterally. Autocratic management automatically presumes that workers will not be productive if they have a choice. Variations of this style are authoritative, persuasive, and paternalistic. Autocratic leadership is vital in many workplace environments. In this guide, well examine autocratic leadership and what it has meant in the past. Theory y sees work as a natural part of life from which people gain a sense of satisfaction. Job performance in secondary schools of west arsi zone m. Doc impacts of principals leadership style on teachers.
All processes operate under rigid rules and procedures, creativity and freethinking are not a priority. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction article pdf available in international business research 52 january 2012 with 55,281 reads how we measure reads. Jul 11, 2017 the article presents you all the differences between autocratic and democratic leadership. Management consists of the planning, prioritizing, and organizing work efforts to accomplish objectives within a business organization. In this style of leadership, a leader has complete command and hold over their employeesteam. There are three classes of supervisory techniques autocratic, participative or consultative and freerein and corresponding to these three techniques, there are three management styles autocratic, democratic and laissezfaire.
He states that the autocratic leader dominates teammembers and uses unilateralism to achieve a singular objective. This leaves the marginally competent who hang on for dear life rather jump ship. A critique of the characteristics of an autocratic leadership style. Autocratic leaders tend to tells subordinates what to do and expect them to do it.
This prevents workers from having to halt projects or push back deadlines. This type of leadership style is seen mostly in businesses. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. This compliance is almost automatic, we really dont think much about it, we just do it for example, if you are driving and a police officer pulls you over. This leadership style has been greatly criticized during the past 30 years.
Autocratic leadership can be defined as a leadership style, wherein a clear line of demarcation between leader and follower exist, as the leader has got absolute power of commanding and decision making. You might say it is a request that induces compliance or obedience. There is an ongoing debate about the concepts of management and leadership with some. He argues that this management style generally results in passive resistance from teammembers and may require a continuous pressure and direction from.
Morale in this company is often low and there is a high turnover of employees. Rapid decisions in companies where there are multiple levels of leadership, decisions, and feedback from senior management can take a long time to make it to employees. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments. Researchers of this study categorized leadership styles into three main styles of leadership, which helped to organize the observations into more simplified data. The next step towards improving an autocratic leadership style is to help the manager make small adjustments through coaching, discussions, seminars. Thus, a leader enjoys the full authority and imposes his will on others. A critique of the autocratic leadership style reveals that it brings forth some advantages such as getting things done quickly and extracting more work from employees without putting them under stress. An authoritarian leadership style is exemplified when a leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the subordinates. Staff and team members have little opportunity to make suggestions, even if these would be in the teams or the organizations best interest. A thesis proposal teferi mulisa college education and behavioral sciences department educational planning and management program ma. Democratic management, on the other hand, gives its workers relative freedom. Norman schwarzkopf leadership style relates to a specific behavior and will be influenced by the leaders aims and personality as well as their relationship and interaction with the team. Such leaders do not inquire about the consent and the considerations of subordinates and do whatever they feel is necessary in order to achieve a goal. The competencies of the leader matter tremendously, as most of the decisions are made by the individual.
Difference between autocratic and democratic leadership. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction article pdf available in international business research 52 january 2012. Leadership is the ability to move a group towards a common goal that would not be. Your leadership style affects every aspect of your small business, from how your employees approach their work to how you implement business strategies. All leaders do not possess same attitude or same perspective. While autocratic leadership is one of the least popular management styles, its also among the most common. Autocratic leadership is a form of management style in which one leader or member of the organisation takes decisions on behalf of the company. The subordinates of an autocratic leader are not involved in decision making and have little if any autonomy. Autocratic, democratic, and laissezfaire, with autocratic being the most controlling and laissezfaire being the least controlling. The article presents you all the differences between autocratic and democratic leadership. Autocratic leadership is a management style wherein one person controls all the decisions and takes very little inputs from other group members.
This leads to autocratic and paternalistic management styles. The autocratic style provides fast crisis management benefits. Asian and western management styles, innovative culture and professionals skills abstract a significant body of research has focused on the conceptualization of management styles as either asian or western, with studies showing evidence of a positive relationship between management style and professional skills. The next step towards improving an autocratic leadership style is to help the manager make small adjustments through coaching, discussions, seminars, books, and guidance.
There are many ways to lead and every leader has own style. Since one person is in charge of autocratic leadership, arrangements can be made rapidly. Autocratic management allows managers to make all the decisions, without really taking into consideration their subordinates opinions, feelings, ideas, and concerns. The styles of leadership the terminology style is roughly equivalent to the leaders behavior. Autocratic leaders tend to drive talent people out of the organization. An autocratic leader is one who does not delegate tasks but rather maintains total control of subordinates and expects complete compliance. List of books and articles about leadership styles and theory.
You rarely consult your team members and, instead, tend to tell them what you want, when you want it, and how you want it done. Autocratic leadership is a form of management style in which one leader or. Autocratic leaders make choices or decisions based on their own beliefs and do not involve others for their suggestion or advice. In a study conducted by okoroji, anyanwu, and ukpere 2014, a democratic leadership style was found to be the most effective style because student. Leadership styles and theory leadership is the process of motivating a group of people to act towards accomplishing a common task. The leader alone makes decisions and takes responsibility for the conduct, results and achievement of the organization. Successful instructional leadership styles in education. Mcnamara 2003 describes this authoritative management style as the autocratic. The manager is always watching his workers and punishes them for errors and mistakes. As discussed earlier, few leaders adopt the carrot approach and a few adopt the stick approach. In the roman empire, the emperors were considered autocratic leaders. Impacts of leadership style effectiveness of managers and. Autocratic management is the most controlling of the management styles.
This style works well in a crisis, when a task must be completed quickly. Some business owners adopt an autocratic management style, viewing their employees as nothing more than chess pieces, perhaps. Difference between autocratic and democratic leadership with. In 1939, a group of researchers led by germanamerican psychologist kurt lewin identified three major leadership.
On the other hand, a leadership style in which the leader values the opinions and suggestions of the. This leads to more consultative and participative management styles. There are number of recognized versions, or styles, of leadership, some of which have been shown to be more effective than others. Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where leaders have absolute power over their workers or team. Thus, all of the leaders do not get the things done in the same manner. The autocratic leadership process generally entails one person making all strategic decisions for subordinates. You most commonly adopt an authoritarian or autocratic leadership style. Autocratic leaders are generally persons who make choices based on their own in sting and judgments thus rarely accept advice or ideas from others. Wiles, 1990 and these include the autocratic, democratic and laissezfaire leadership styles liberman et al. It is the way in which the leader influences the followers luthans, 1977. Asian and western management styles, innovative culture.
Management style is the manner in which managers exercise their authority in the workplace and ensure that their objectives are achieved. The use of the term leadership style has become much more common in recent years and has largely replaced the term management style in the work of management thinkers. Jul 26, 2016 the historical examples of autocratic leaders hold the key to understanding the type of leadership this model suggests. Impact of leadership on teams performance harshitha gadirajurrett portland state university.
A critique of the autocratic leadership style brighthub. Impact of autocratic leadership on motivation and performance. Autocratic leadership examples can be found in all positions of power, such as community leaders, workplace managers, religious leaders and even in the home. A manager with this style typically relies on his authority, assertiveness, position and fear to motivate workers to complete tasks on time. Subordinates may become overly dependent upon the leader 2. In the autocratic leadership style, the leader centralizes the decisionmaking power in himself and give directions to his subordinates as to what they are supposed to do and how they are required to perform the given task. Asian and western management styles, innovative culture and. In paternalistic style, decisions will be taken into account the best interests of the employees 3. Certainly gen x employees have proven to be highly resistant to this management style.